AutoMKV x264 Encoding

Website: Doom9

We tested x264 compression using AutoMKV version 0.97.1 and x264 to to compress a 1.1GB DVD VOB file into 350MB MP4 file using a two-pass encode and we used a 112kbps LAME encoder to compress the audio. The whole process is dependent on both single and multi-core performance and the entire encoding time was recorded.

There's quite a shift to using MKV or MP4 wrappers for x264 content now, especially for movie content and those in the large anime fansubbing community. x264 doesn't have the same SSE enhancements as DivX 6.8, but the benefits of extra cache and better memory performance should still show notable improvements.

x264 Encoding

AutoMKV 0.97.1, 1.05GB MPEG-2 VOB to 350MB x264 .mp4, LAME MT 112Kbps

  • Core i7 920 OC (4x4GHz, 1,600MHz DDR3, 3.6GHz QPI)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 OC (4x3.6GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 OC (4x3.6GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • AMD Phenom X4 9850 OC (4x3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 OC (2x4.0GHz, 1,760MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 OC (2x4.0GHz, 1,760MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • AMD Phenom X4 9750 (4x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core i7 920 (4x2.66GHz, 4.8GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
  • AMD Phenom X4 9850 BE (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core i7 965 (4x3.2GHz, 6.4GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
  • Core i7 940 (4x2.93GHz, 4.8GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4x2.83GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4x2.83GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.66GHz, 1,066MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.66GHz, 1,066MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9450 (4x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9450 (4x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (4x3.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (4x3.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9650 (4x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9650 (4x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
    • 193.7
    • 168.3
    • 166.4
    • 145.0
    • 136.0
    • 133.0
    • 129.1
    • 126.8
    • 126.5
    • 124.9
    • 115.9
    • 109.6
    • 102.8
    • 101.6
    • 100.3
    • 100.0
    • 97.4
    • 96.7
    • 95.1
    • 93.9
    • 75.5
    • 73.1
    • 70.9
    • 69.6
0
50
100
150
200
Relative Percentage (Normalised to 100%)
  • Relative CPU Value

Again the Core i7 920 at 4GHz provides fantastic relative price : performance value here with a 94 percent increase over the baseline 100 value, although the overclocked Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 with DDR2 or DDR3 isn't far behind. The overclocked Phenom X4 9850 is a solid 45 percent into positive CPU value, although all the AMD CPUs have a good value.

In fact, the AMD CPUs, while generally lower performing are better value because they simply cost much less than the Core i7's, which generally trounce them in direct performance comparisons. The rest of the current Intel Core 2 line-up fritters at the lower end of the table because they tend to be more expensive, and offer less extra performance to compensate.

x264 Encoding

AutoMKV 0.97.1, 1.05GB MPEG-2 VOB to 350MB x264 .mp4, LAME MT 112Kbps

  • Core i7 920 OC (4x4GHz, 1,600MHz DDR3, 3.6GHz QPI)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 OC (4x3.6GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • AMD Phenom X4 9850 OC (4x3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6600 OC (4x3.6GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core i7 920 (4x2.66GHz, 4.8GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
  • Core i7 965 (4x3.2GHz, 6.4GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
  • AMD Phenom X4 9850 BE (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • AMD Phenom X4 9750 (4x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
  • Core i7 940 (4x2.93GHz, 4.8GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 OC (2x4.0GHz, 1,760MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4x2.83GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9450 (4x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.66GHz, 1,066MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4x2.83GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9450 (4x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Duo E8400 OC (2x4.0GHz, 1,760MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.66GHz, 1,066MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9650 (4x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (4x3.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR2)
  • Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (4x3.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Quad Q9650 (4x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
  • Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
    • 186.5
    • 166.4
    • 151.4
    • 136.9
    • 135.6
    • 135.3
    • 133.3
    • 131.4
    • 129.4
    • 129.0
    • 124.9
    • 122.7
    • 114.9
    • 114.4
    • 102.9
    • 100.0
    • 95.3
    • 94.4
    • 91.9
    • 89.3
    • 89.2
    • 86.9
    • 85.0
    • 69.0
0
50
100
150
200
Relative Percentage (Normalised to 100%)
  • Relative Platform Value

In total platform value, the Core i7 920 at 4GHz again heads the table here by a convincing margin - an 87 percent increase in value compared to the baseline E8500 CPU with DDR2 is a considerable benefit. The inexpensive AMD platforms again resides in very positive values near the top of the table again, and the Core i7's, despite the much more expensive total platform cost still hit a solid 29-35 percent relative positive price : performance margin.

For an inexpensive, high value platform though we'd still have to go for the Core 2 Quad Q6600 at 3.6GHz which is a solid 66 percent into the relative positivem, and is only second to the overclocked Core i7 920. If you've already got a Q6600 overclocked to the brim - you'll be glad to know you've made a great investment for video encoding.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04